EagleThe dithering is over; just when it seemed the Eagle had floundered, she’s finally confirmed she’s going to mount a challenge to Jeremy Corbyn after all. The woman who swiftly followed Hilary Benn out of the Shadow Cabinet a couple of weeks ago was pushed forward as an early challenger, yet seemed to exhibit the same lack of bottle that afflicted many of those who threw their hats into the ring when Ed Miliband quit and then hastily grabbed them back again. But the right wing of the Labour Party, desperately lacking any evident vote-winner, have turned to the eldest of the Eagle twins (by 15 minutes) because it would appear nobody else will dare to step forward.

Her challenge must present the left wing of Labour with something of a moral dilemma. Angela Eagle is a woman and a lesbian to boot, one of the first female MPs to come out (as far back as 1997). She ticks a fair few of the requisite boxes that should, in theory, earn her the admiration of the hug-a-minority brigade; but by daring to stand against Jezza – which, to the hardcore Corbynistas is as unforgivable as criticising Muhammad is to Fundamentalist Muslims – she will forever be painted as Labour’s Lady Macbeth, especially if she succeeds in toppling the Messiah. She also has to contend with the trade unions, furious that their man in Westminster could be ousted, an anger personified in arrogant threats from the General Secretary of Unite, Professional Scouser Len McCluskey. And then there are the online recruits to the membership, joining in their thousands day-by-day, as Corbyn’s attack dogs are fond of constantly reminding us. Even her own local Labour party in her constituency of Wallasey are opposed to her challenging the leader they support. I can’t say I hold out much hope for Ms Eagle.

Then again, who knows? The last two-and-a-half weeks have taught us not take anything for granted or to make assumptions based on the pattern of a past that can no longer be depended upon to predict the present. What’s most remarkable in this particular case is that a large proportion of Labour MPs have actually got round to challenging Corbyn’s leadership. Rumours of challenges to Brown and Miliband never even got as far as presenting those respective leaders with a candidate to stand against them, though in retrospect they were both deserving of a serious challenge to their fairly inept leadership.

Angela Eagle may seem a strange choice to challenge the radicals’ radical, however. To break down the intimidating wall of parties who have a vested interest in Corbyn’s continuation needs someone with considerable charismatic clout. Like the current Tory contender Theresa May, Eagle has a thin, reedy voice – all treble and no bass. One of the most convincing attributes a leader or prospective leader requires is the ability to broadcast their beliefs in a vocal manner that implies strength and imbues confidence. Listen to recordings of Margaret Thatcher before she became Tory leader and then after; out went the Home Counties housewife and in came the Iron Lady. The conscious deepening of her voice changed the persona she projected to the public and convinced many doubters she had what it took to be entrusted with the keys to No.10.

Such things may sound frivolous, but they count for a lot when a party leader has to get his or her message across to those members of the electorate who have yet to believe the hype. It’s arguable that had Ed Miliband looked like or spoken with the same voice as, say, a young David Owen, the great mass of floating voters may have fallen for him. But what were perceived as his odd looks and even odder voice worked against him as much as any policy he espoused. The collected bald heads of Kinnock, Hague and IDS probably didn’t do any of them any favours either. Like it or not, these are the kind of visual emblems that people pick up on in the beauty contest that politics has become.

Elected to Parliament in 1992, Eagle held a series of junior posts in the Blair Government from 1997-2002 and achieved a prominent ministerial spot under Gordon Brown, promoted to Work and Pensions Secretary in 2009. After the 2010 General Election defeat, she served as a member of Miliband’s Shadow Cabinet, eventually becoming Shadow Leader of the Commons; when Miliband fell on his sword last year she aimed for Deputy Leadership of the party, but only finished fourth. Under Corbyn, she was Shadow Business Secretary, the post she quit a fortnight ago. It’s fair to say she hasn’t exactly set Parliament alight over the past couple of decades; in fact, it took until 2012 before the general public noticed her by default, when David Cameron used her as the butt of his hilarious Michael Winner joke. I admit I myself only recently realised she had a twin sister, let alone that Maria was alongside her in the Commons.

So, it would seem the real challenge here is not to convince the necessary number of Labour MPs that Angela Eagle can lead her party and then, as is hoped, her country, but to convince the membership. Good luck with that, dear.

© The Editor



  1. In defence of Angela Eagle, whenever it was Deputy PMQs and she stood-in for Corbyn, she generally slaughtered Gideon Osborne – although, to be fair, he never was the sharpest knife in the cutlery-drawer at face-to-face combat, more a devious backroom schemer, but she certainly had his measure.
    Were she to succeed against Corbyn, the Labour Party would be seen to be replacing a suburban comprehensive geography teacher with someone who’d look more comfortable behind the tills at Morrison’s. And, as the post outlines, such impressions, albeit unfairly, score points aplenty in the minds of our fickle voters.

    More significant will be whether the paid-up members of the two major parties, in their apparently ‘democratic’ leadership contests, demonstrate a commitment to get elected or would rather spend their time scoring endless Brownie-points of principle. We could usually rely on the Tories to retain focus on the former, while the history with Corbyn’s elevation suggests that Labour members are more likely to favour the latter, but these are not normal times and anyone foolhardy enough to forecast outomes of any current ballot should be made to lie down in a darkened room until the feeling passes.

    What does seem certain is that, from the recent impact of UKIP votes, the phenomenal rise of the SNP in Westminster seats, the Brexit referendum vote and the consequential major party traumas, politics in Britain will never be the same again – how different it will be once all the pieces settle is impossible to foretell, but different it will surely be.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I’ll be voting Corbyn, pretty much because he seems the more determined to make sure Labour speaks on behalf on its members, rather than the professional class of MP who seems happy to take the membership fees and then betray everything that member has joined the party for – social justice, fair working conditions etc, rather than selling out to big business and finance. A second election now, barely a year after Corbyn won with 60 % of the vote seems even more reprehensible than a second EU exit referendum, won with only 52 % of the vote. Labour parliamentary MPs should be ashamed of themselves, for not finding a way to work with their elected leader while still representing their constituents.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. One of the major problems which many Labour MPs will now face is exactly that, ‘representing their constituents’.
      For example, when 70% of the electors in Doncaster voted Leave, how should Ed Miliband represent his constituents when he will certainly continue to support a Remain position ? Or does ‘representing their constituents’ only work in certain circumstances ? Similar results occurred in many traditional Labour strongholds. The referendum made crystal-clear the views of all MPs’ constituents on that particular issue, so an MP has no excuse whatsoever for not adhering to the view so democratically expressed.

      I would have thought that any dedicated ‘Remain’ MP, of whatever party, who found the majority of his constituents had voted Leave should either:-
      (a) Now become a ‘Leave’ MP, albeit reluctantly, or
      (b) Resign immediately and, if he wishes, stand again in the by-election on his Remain ticket.
      That’s what ‘representing their constituents’ should really be about.

      (Note: The same principle would obviously apply to any ‘Leave’ MPs who found their constituents had voted Remain – I’m at least consistent).
      (Real world note: None of them will do that, having the democratic integrity of a fruit fly.)


      1. The problem with that is that those who voted for the majority leave vote may not be the same majority that voted in a Labour MP – the issue crossed party lines. Also results were reported by borough, not Parliamentary constituencies. Otherwise, no argument.


      2. It certainly crossed party-lines and it is that aspect which causes the greatest concern to the Labour Party, who never expected that so many of their previously-trusted voters would ‘get it wrong’.

        Although the public reporting was indeed on a local authority basis, those party observers who attended the count will have identified the scale of votes-piles from each individual polling-station as they were being counted, so will have available an even more detailed breakdown of the geographical origins of the majority, down to neighbourhood-level in most places.
        Whether that valuable information is then used for any future policy positioning will depend on which fork in the road the parties choose to take, pragmatism or dogmatism. The next year or so may indicate their choices.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.