GARDENERS’ QUESTION TIME

Maybe a glorified paddling pool was the most fitting tribute to our ‘Queen of Hearts’; the Diana Memorial Fountain in Hyde Park, which opened to an underwhelming fanfare in 2004, was, like the public image of the woman it was supposed to be a tribute to, an impressive triumph of style over substance. In the years immediately following the premature death of the former Princess of Wales, many such fanciful schemes were suggested, some considerably abstract and bearing little obvious relation to the woman herself. Perhaps the unintentionally hilarious statue of Diana and Dodi in Harrods was at the forefront of the minds concocting these prospective memorials.

Joanna Lumley, an actress who doesn’t seem to act very much anymore, suggested a ‘floating paradise’ as one more bizarre tribute to Diana barely a year after events in Paris; this somewhat vague concept eventually morphed into the notion of a bridge that also doubled up as a garden – with or without the Diana brand attached to it. Following her successful campaign to gain Gurkhas the right to settle in the UK, Lumley suddenly had a public platform that proved immensely attractive to politicians hoping some of Purdey’s star quality would rub off on them. One such politician was the ex-London Mayor Boris Johnson. Riding high on the PR victory of the 2012 London Olympics, Bo-Jo gave the green light to what became the London Garden Bridge project.

Ah, yes – the Garden Bridge. It is now officially an ex-bridge, bereft of life and all that. The ambitious (if rather impractical) idea of another shortcut across the Thames that would serve as a novel rural facsimile in the heart of the capital looked good on paper, yes; but the proposed location wasn’t a part of London in desperate need of another bridge and the locals whose lives would be disrupted by its protracted construction weren’t even consulted as Boris took it upon himself to be the project’s salesman; when he gained planning permission in 2014, Johnson’s record in facilitating the ongoing despoiling of the capital’s skyline by constantly ruling in favour of developers over opposition didn’t give cause for optimism.

Initially, the public were told the bridge would be financed by private investors, but the struggle to raise the required funds necessitated the diverting of taxpayers’ money into the project – a total that now stands at around an estimated £46.4m. As Chancellor, George Osborne promised Boris £30m from the public purse, and a chunk of that squandered cash found its way into the black hole of the Garden Bridge courtesy of David Cameron; Dave ignored the advice of his civil servants by throwing more taxpayer’s money at it when the failure of recruiting enough private investors revealed a £56m shortfall in the accounts of the trust set up to handle the lucre.

The Garden Bridge had its critics from day one; they viewed it as an expensive vanity project that could be to Cameron’s Government what the Millennium Dome was to Blair’s. Its proponents, such as chairman of the trust, Lord Davies, claimed the Bridge would be a ‘beautiful new green space in the heart of London’; but it’s not as though Central London, for all its traffic bottlenecks and overcrowded pavements, doesn’t already have an abundance of spacious parks and green squares to breathe in – most of which have been part of the London landscape for well over a century.

The Garden Bridge could well have gone ahead as a felicitous white elephant for Japanese tourists if enough private investors had been prepared to pay for its construction as well as the projected £3m a year needed for maintenance once open; but for so much public money to have been squandered on ‘a public space’ without public consultation is outrageous, especially now the whole thing has been abandoned.

A review into the project chaired by Dame Margaret Hodge was severely critical of the methods of raising money for it and also of Boris Johnson for his inability to justify the public expense; Hodge’s conclusion was that it would be better to call time on the Garden Bridge before any further costs were unwittingly incurred by taxpayers. Johnson’s successor as London Mayor Sadiq Khan has finally pulled the plug on it following the findings of the review, though some say he could have spared even more expense had he done so earlier; his predecessor claims Khan has killed the Bridge out of spite, saying ‘The Garden Bridge was a beautiful project and could have been easily financed’, though his own failure to finance it without regular recourse to the public purse hardly backs up his response to the Mayor’s belated decision.

As another cheerleader for the Garden Bridge, even Lord Davies admitted earlier this year that the project was not currently ‘a going concern’. The trust still hadn’t purchased the land on the South Bank of the Thames that would serve as the bridge’s southern landing and no private investors have been persuaded to part with their pennies for a full twelve months. The total provided by private investors is alleged to be around £70m, though how much of the public money wasted on the project was spent on courting potential private investors is unknown.

Ultimately, the London Garden Bridge can join a list of other intended attractions for the capital that never made it beyond the drawing board, though some came closer to succeeding. Watkin’s Tower, London’s planned answer to the Eiffel Tower in the 1890s which, had it been completed, would still be taller than the Shard, made it as far as 154ft before being abandoned and then demolished, eventually making way for Wembley Stadium. But it’s interesting to note that one of the proposed ideas for the Wembley site prior to the partial construction of the Tower was a replica of the Great Pyramid of Giza, in which food would be grown in hanging gardens. Perhaps the committee responsible for the Garden Bridge should have studied their London history books beforehand.

© The Editor

4 thoughts on “GARDENERS’ QUESTION TIME

  1. Aside from the vanity issues and the vast amounts which will have already vanished in bungs, back-handers and sweeteners for the fanciful Garden Bridge, the last thing London needs is any more public money spent on its selfish transport infrastructure.
    Any smart government would set into law a moratorium on any public spending on transport infrastructure within the M25 for 50 years – London sucks up taxpayers’ cash like a dry sponge (e.g. Crossrail), with the result that it attracts yet more of the nation’s focus, leaving the vast majority even further out in the cold, underdeveloped, under-supported outlands, a situation which will continue to worsen until the focus changes.

    If London had no more spent on it, then it would progressively grind itself to a halt, by which point the smart operators would have finally realised that there’s life outside the Orbital and start investing in the rest of the country, sharing the prosperity of worthwhile employment, reducing congestion & pollution, also reducing depravation and welfare dependency around the land.
    There’s no longer a need to concentrate everything in one place, we’ve now got telecoms to overcome those problems, and we certainly don’t need a yet bigger train-set like HS2 just to make the problem worse.

    London’s an awful place (Grenfell Tower, anyone?), made even more awful by the effect it has on the rest of the country – it’s high time the balance shifted and the day of the monster-city was finally ended.

    Like

    1. You have only written that to get a reaction…

      Here’s one: You’re talking rubbish, especially regarding the finances

      http://colresearch.typepad.com/colresearch/2014/11/what-does-london-contribute-.html

      London is a great place to live if you have the mindset for it (which, I admit, escapes me on some days).

      But the wealth of culture, high and low, extremes of expression, art, history, knowledge and creativity more than make up for the occasional off day. And judging a city by one event (Grenfell Tower) can apply anywhere – Hillsborough defines Sheffield? Aberfan defines Wales? Disasters are a British way of life, unfortunately, due to the preponderance of short-sighted and greedy politicians the length and breadth of the United Kingdom.

      In reality, you’re just jealous.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. OK, deliberately provocative perhaps, but there’s some truth in there too.

        Despite London generating substantial wealth and tax-revenues, that doesn’t mean the only way to achieve that wealth is in a single, oversized, congested, polluted place – outside the M25 there’s some attractive places, some very bright people and many untapped opportunities which will only be realised once the ‘south-east magnet’ blinkers are removed.

        There are few things in life which are capable of arousing jealousy in me, London ain’t one of them – the best thing to come out of London is the M1 Northbound (and the occasional contributor here, of course).

        Like

  2. ^ ” I come live outside the M25 “, as the song from Catatonia put it!

    Ironically, the lead singer now lives in London apparently, she turned up in one of the residents youtube commentaries in the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower incident!

    Like

Comments are closed.