Considering all the cynical baggage accumulated on life’s journey, retaining a little lingering magic in relation to a specific source of childhood fascination doesn’t do any harm; even if utterly illogical, it serves a purpose as a welcome interlude from the grown-up grind. I’ve often found that magic via the London Underground. Yes, we’re all aware of its numerous faults and no sane person would use it during the rush hour unless work made doing so an unavoidable necessity; but for me it’s the nearest non-Time Lords can get to owning a Tardis. You arrive in one station, jump on the train, you arrive at another station that looks like the one you just left, you travel up the steps and you’re in a completely different corner of the capital without having witnessed the route from A to B as one would over-ground. I’m well aware of the science, but it’s still magical to me.
However, from its innovative inception in 1863, the London Underground has regularly inspired as much dread in some as it has magic in others. A train service that could travel below the surface of the great metropolis naturally provoked shivers; perhaps it was the thought of people being ferried about in a neighbourhood previously reserved for the dead. These kinds of associations have continued to exert an influence over popular culture’s view of the Tube, something the numerous abandoned lines and ‘ghost stations’ have aided and abetted.
The 1967 ‘Doctor Who’ story, ‘The Web of Fear’, played on these old superstitions by taking Patrick Troughton’s Doctor and his companions deep underground, where the alien Yeti were plotting world domination; and anyone who has seen the 1972 horror movie, ‘Death Line’, will never have heard the familiar Tube phrase ‘Mind the Gap’ in quite the same way since. But there have also been occasions in which genuine horrors have visited these subterranean departure lounges; and while they remain amongst the most used suicide sites in London (643 were attempted across the network in the decade from 2000-10), death has often struck without premeditation.
Bethnal Green 1943, Moorgate 1975 and King’s Cross 1987 – three stations and three dates that marked a trio of disasters. The first was an awful accident, a stampede to Bethnal Green Tube Station’s wartime use as a makeshift air-raid shelter when the crowd mistakenly believed an air-raid was taking place; 173 were crushed in the panic, mostly women and children. It’s believed to be the largest single loss of civilian life during WWII on the home-front. The cause of the Moorgate tragedy of 1975 remains disputed, though many have accepted the driver drove into the tunnel end beyond the platform, killing himself and 43 passengers in an act of suicide. The King’s Cross fire of 1987 killed 31 and was thought to have begun when a lit match or cigarette ignited debris beneath the wooden escalators that were subsequently replaced; the incident also marked the start of a more rigorous enforcement of the Tube’s smoking ban.
There have also been more deliberate attempts at slaughter below street level. The IRA had a crack as far back as 1939, during a mainland bombing campaign that tends to be overshadowed by other events of that year; their more well-known assault on the city from 1973-76 saw various stations targeted, though the intended roll-call of casualties was mercifully small. It wasn’t until the 7/7 attacks of 2005 that the London Underground was the scene of a successful terrorist outrage, with an overall death-toll of 52. For many, the carnage of 7 July 2005 served as a good reason to avoid the Tube altogether, though as we have come to belatedly realise this year, any location in which crowds of people are liable to gather will suffice. Perhaps it’s the instinctive fear of being trapped underground that imbues this particular method of transport with such horrific resonance for many.
Today’s events at Parsons Green seem to have been the work of an amateur or maybe the mechanism simply cocked-up at the crucial moment. The home-made device was planted in a bucket inside a carrier bag in a carriage travelling along the District Line from Wimbledon and was detonated as the train was pulling into the station; its detonation appeared to cause what has been described as a ‘wall of fire’ that left 22 commuters with burns. Taking place at the height of the rush hour (around 8.20am), the device was obviously designed to provoke greater damage than it turned out to and police have already claimed to have identified a suspect via CCTV footage.
I think we can all probably write the script of what follows next, though the surname of the suspect and the mosque he frequented will remain a mystery until all is eventually revealed as the event continues to play out on rolling news channels for the next 24 hours. The well-oiled counter-terrorist machine rattled into action minutes after panicked passengers exited Parsons Green and the obligatory COBRA summit was arranged in record time. But will any of that mean we can sleep easy in our beds? Well, I reckon those of us who don’t suffer from insomnia probably do so regardless of whatever lunacy is currently gripping the waking world. The real concern surrounds public, rather than private, places.
For some it’s simply a convenient means to get from one part of London to another; for others it’s an unnatural incursion into a netherworld that should never have been disturbed; for some it’s a nightmarish, claustrophobic approximation of life as a sardine; and for others it’s one of the greatest engineering achievements those ingenious Victorians left behind for us. It’s all of these things and more, both good and bad. All that life can afford, as Dr Johnson might have said.
© The Editor
The Tube system is indeed both good and bad: a brilliant example of Victorian vision, investment and engineering, capped off with that brilliantly designed schematic map which we all know so well, even if we never use it (other than trying to follow the competition in ‘Mornington Crescent’, yet always failing).
The ‘bad’, apart from its recent terrorism targeting, comes from its very success in its basic aim: to move masses of people around the city quickly.
Imagine for a moment that the Tube didn’t exist and it soon becomes apparent that London in its present state would not exist either. Without that capacity to shift so much workforce, between so many points, so quickly, would mean that, for many organisations, it would never have been feasible to operate in London. So they’d have had to start, operate, develop and grow elsewhere in the country, spreading the load and the wealth more evenly, thus preventing London from becoming a clogged, congested, impractical, dangerous, over-priced hell-hole, as some of us outsiders see it.
So despite its objective success, the Tube may actually have ruined the very thing it was designed to serve, an infrastructure Frankenstein’s monster, perhaps.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s an interesting point, to imagine London without the Underground. Considering the over-ground traffic congestion the capital suffers from even with the Tube, it’s a hell of a thought and could even complete the ultimate takeover of the cyclist…
LikeLike
The Victorians certainly knew how to construct railways.
Indeed, the railway system in Ireland as of late nineteenth century was significantly better than it is today.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The pre-tube population of London was about six million in 1880, far and away Britain’s biggest conglomeration. Because London didn’t have efficient transport links businesses needed to cluster near the other businesses they dealt with, so that messengers could carry papers to and fro. Which concentrated such things as financial knowledge and capital in the City, for example, with major insurers close by major merchant banks close by the Stock Exchange. And also communications technology, with the City having over half the telex and telegraph lines in the country in the 1880s and soon to be an early adopter of the telephone.
The Underground may have made Londoners’ journeys quicker and easier (and probably less malodorous) than by horse-drawn omnibus – not to mention opening up the suburbs, which improved a huge number of lives – but London was a monstrous size before the underground, despite the misery of commuting hours. Transport doesn’t drive London’s growth, opportunity does: for so long as London can offer better, and better-paid, jobs than elsewhere it’ll keep growing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
” The pre-tube population of London was about six million in 1880, far and away Britain’s biggest conglomeration. Because London didn’t have efficient transport links businesses needed to cluster near the other businesses they dealt with, so that messengers could carry papers to and fro. Which concentrated such things as financial knowledge and capital in the City, for example, with major insurers close by major merchant banks close by the Stock Exchange. And also communications technology, with the City having over half the telex and telegraph lines in the country in the 1880s and soon to be an early adopter of the telephone. ”
6.6 million would have been one of the biggest conglomerations in the world at that time, I’m guessing?
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
I enjoy taking the tube and I will probably start a blog on the Northern Line after I have finished this blog about the number 43 bus route
LikeLike