LET ME ENTERTAIN YOU

Stan BowlesOne of the most consistently enjoyable YT channels for me over the past three or four years has been The Critical Drinker. This consists of author Will Jordan adopting the persona of a moderately inebriated Scotsman narrating subjective movie reviews and amusingly incisive dissections of the way in which Hollywood works these days; his series, ‘Why Modern Movies Suck’ is amongst the most thorough – and thoroughly entertaining – studies of the contemporary film industry and its cultural corrosion as any you’ll find on any medium today. His videos are often very funny, but nine times out of ten he nails it with intelligent and enlightening logic. Although he never appears on camera on his own channel, the Drinker’s reputation has grown to the point whereby he’s now beginning to routinely turn up on other YT channels to discuss his specialist subject; one such appearance was in a new Triggernometry video, during which Konstantin Kisin and Francis Foster quizzed him on the death of the movie star – that larger-than-life personality who could put bums on cinema seats on the strength of his name alone. His demise was attributed to several factors, though an anecdote referencing Richard Burton, who disappeared for a week when making ‘Where Eagles Dare’ simply to go on a bender (without informing anyone else involved in the film where he was) was used as an example of the kind of characters that used to inhabit the movie business and no longer do. But this isn’t something exclusive to acting; one could similarly apply that to the music biz and sport.

All the revered rock stars who continue to provide source material for endless books, biopics, articles and documentaries are either dead or in their 80s; likewise, where be the Ian Botham or the James Hunt or the John McEnro of 2024? It’s hard to imagine the dullard sportsmen or women of today still being talked (and written) about 30 or 40 years from now, just as it is our current authors, artists or actors. This either suggests society no longer produces such figures or that such figures just don’t go into these fields anymore because they’ve become so sterile and corporate they’re no longer open to them. Another factor which came up during the Critical Drinker’s Triggernometry interview in relation to movie stars is the loss of mystique that has come with social media; at one time, we’d have to wait till movie stars were past retirement age to get an insight into what they were like as people via an appearance on ‘Parkinson’. Today, we’re now exposed to every dim thought that enters their unscripted heads via Twitter; it’s almost as though it’s written into their contracts that they have to issue opinions on everything from climate change to LGBTXYZ matters – and it has to be the ‘right’ opinion, of course; in the case of football, that’s no problem if you’re Gary Lineker, less so if you’re Joey Barton.

Perhaps the timing is sadly apt, then, to bid farewell to the kind of character whose undoubted talent would certainly still be craved by any football team today, but whose considerable baggage most likely wouldn’t. I’m talking about Stan Bowles, the former footballer whose glory years came at Queens Park Rangers in the 1970s and who passed away over the weekend. Like several players of his generation, he’d been struggling with Alzheimer’s for the last decade and the debilitating disease finally claimed him at the age of 75. The generation Bowles belonged to contained several footballers routinely referred to as ‘mavericks’ – hugely gifted individuals who nonetheless combined their talents with personality traits that managers found hard to rein-in, meaning the bigger and more successful clubs largely avoided signing them. Naturally, they all followed in the footsteps of George Best, the original footballing rock star; and when Best’s drinking and love of the bright lights curtailed his career at the highest level, there were numerous flair players emboldened by Best’s example who quickly filled the void; Frank Worthington was one, and Stan Bowles was another.

Hailing from Manchester, Bowles was signed by the blue half of the city as a teenage apprentice but made only a handful of appearances before a bust-up with Man City coach Malcolm Allison led to him being dispatched to lowly Bury; Bowles then dropped into the Fourth Division, joining Crewe Alexandra, and his nascent career was already beginning to take on the shape of a journeyman when he moved to Second Division Carlisle Utd in 1971. However, it was his year at Carlisle – where he scored 18 goals in 51 games – that helped him catch the eye of fellow Division 2 club Queens Park Rangers, who were eager to find a replacement for star man Rodney Marsh, recently lost to Manchester City. Bowles wasn’t intimidated at the prospect of filling Marsh’s No.10 shirt and his skills as well as his humorous, devil-may-care approach to the game quickly won the fans over. QPR, like many of the capital’s clubs, languished in the all-conquering shadows of Arsenal, Spurs and Chelsea, and it wasn’t until the club achieved promotion in 1973 that the First Division got to see what Stan Bowles could really do. The arrival of ex-Chelsea boss Dave Sexton in 1974 galvanised QPR into an unprecedented period of success, with Bowles at the centre of it.

Something of a ‘London All-Stars’ team at the time, QPR also included former Arsenal captain Frank McLintock in their ranks as well as ex-Chelsea teammates David Webb and John Hollins. Bowles gelled best with club captain Gerry Francis, forming a close bond on and off the pitch; however, whilst Francis was something of a model professional whose natural leadership qualities made him a first choice for England, Bowles was what one might call a ‘wild card’, and he consequently only played for his country on five occasions. Bowles could – and should – have earned far more international caps, but he was regarded as a bit of liability due to his antics, and stories of Stan Bowles are the stuff of laddish legend. Fond of placing a bet, Bowles would often sneak round the corner to a nearby bookie’s on a match day at QPR’S Loftus Road ground shortly before kick-off, usually wearing his full kit; Gerry Francis recalled visiting Stan at home for dinner and the meal being interrupted by the bailiffs, who proceeded to cart away the furniture, leaving dinner to be completed sitting on the floor; and there was the famous occasion when Bowles appeared alongside a group of dedicated athletes on the BBC’s popular ‘Superstars’ TV series whilst nursing a hangover; he ended up with the programme’s all-time record low score. Never a dull moment with Stan.

Whilst it might have seemed winning was secondary to entertaining for Bowles, QPR nevertheless came within a whisker of being League Champions in 1976, only just pipped at the post on the last day of the season by Liverpool. The club has never come so close to winning the title ever again, and most likely never will. They did qualify for Europe due to their runner-up status, though, and Bowles dazzled in QPR’s UEFA Cup campaign the following season, scoring a record eleven goals as the club reached the Quarter Finals of the competition, only to lose a penalty shoot-out to AEK Athens. QPR never reached the heights of the mid-70s again, and Bowles left the club in 1979, briefly signed by Brian Clough’s Nottingham Forest before resuming journeyman status at Leyton Orient and Brentford, where he hung up his boots in 1984 – not exactly retiring with the kind of nest-egg today’s players can look forward to, though his gambling didn’t really help.

Stan Bowles never lost any sleep over the opposition. He wasn’t a thinker when it came to the game; he just let his natural talent get on with it. A shrug of the shoulders if he lost, and then it was off down the boozer, or the bookie’s, or the boudoir. Probably not abundant in the qualities that make an ideal husband, the happiest marriage Stan Bowles ever had was with the fans at Loftus Road, who could forgive him anything for bringing them such joy every Saturday afternoon. A man very much of his era, then – an era that (like the man himself) is out of time and out of step with where we are now; more’s the pity.

© The Editor

Website: https://www.johnnymonroe.co.uk/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?fan_landing=true&u=56665294

POST WAR

VennellsAs the famous example of Ken Loach’s landmark (and traumatic) BBC play, ‘Cathy Come Home’ proved in 1966, it seems that sometimes drama can do what real life often fails to achieve, to actually raise awareness of a pressing issue; it shouldn’t do, but it apparently does. The Post Office IT scandal, in which over 700 sub-postmasters and Post Office branch-owners were wrongly accused, prosecuted and imprisoned on charges of false accounting, fraud and theft over a period of 16 years, has been largely overlooked by the MSM until relatively recently. What is one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in British legal history spans the majority of this century, yet only readers of Private Eye and viewers of ‘Panorama’ appear to have received regular updates on this shocking story as it has unfolded over the past couple of decades. An ITV dramatisation of the affair, ‘Mr Bates Vs the Post Office’, which aired over the Christmas/New Year period, belatedly alerted the wider public as to just what had been going on under their noses. A faulty IT system by the name of Horizon was imposed upon Post Office workers when the 21st century was still in nappies, and it was pretty evident early on to those entrusted to deal with it that the system wasn’t working properly. Not that the Post Office itself acknowledged this, assuring any worker who contacted it to raise concerns that nobody else had done likewise; yet when cash shortfalls began to be detected, the Post Office wasted little time in bringing criminal proceedings against those who had raised these concerns in the first place.

Hundreds of hard-working, decent, law-abiding citizens – the kind routinely held-up by politicians as role model Brits – had their lives, reputations and businesses ruined in order that the bigwigs running the service could save face and continue to rake in their huge salaries and bonuses, not to mention the honours bestowed upon them by clueless Ministers. Even when the scale of the injustice finally emerged into the public eye, the pass-the-parcel blame-game familiar via every useless inquiry from Grenfell to Covid has again resulted in an absolute absence of anyone responsible being held to account. So, former Post Office CEO Paula Vennells bows to public pressure and an online petition with a million signatures by ‘returning’ her CBE in the wake of the delayed outrage generated by the ITV drama – yet even renouncing an honour that can’t be formally revoked until His Majesty intervenes is a token gesture that will bring precious little solace to those still fighting to clear their names; so far, only 93 convictions have been overturned. The Government has offered compensation of £600,000 to those lucky few, yet it’s worth noting that the current Post Office Chief Executive Nick Read received £573,000 for his troubles in 2022/23.

His shamed predecessor headed an organisation that repeatedly denied there were any faults with the Horizon system despite glaring evidence to the contrary, and it’s ironic one of the reasons Ms Vennells was named as a winner in the New Year’s Honours List of 2019 was for her work on ‘diversity and inclusion’; the hundreds of innocent sub-postmasters and branch-workers the Post Office was callously pursuing through the courts whilst Vennells collected her dishonourable honour were not divided on grounds of race or gender; they were all branded criminals regardless of their sex or skin colour, so all that diversity and inclusion work clearly paid off. There’s no indication Paula Vennells will be popping a cheque covering the performance-related bonuses received during her tenure into the same jiffy bag containing her gong, but I suppose that’s asking a bit much. The fact she received them whilst the scapegoats for the Post Office’s own failings were being bankrupted by the cost of legal efforts to clear their names makes the award of such payments all the more grotesque.

Current Lib Dem leader ‘Sir’ Ed Davey was Under-Secretary of State for employment relations, consumer and postal affairs in the Coalition as the scandal first began to come to light, yet his inaction at the time should be a damning indictment on his judgement. In 2010, he refused to see former sub-postmaster and campaigner for the wrongly-accused, Alan Bates (played by Toby Jones in the ITV drama), responding to requests for a meeting by saying he didn’t believe such a meeting ‘would serve any useful purpose’; Bates had lost his job simply by refusing to be fobbed-off by the Post Office when he raised concerns about Horizon. In the wake of ‘Mr Bates Vs the Post Office’, Davey says he regrets not asking ‘tougher questions’ of Post Office managers, but it’s a bit late for regrets, and even if he now accuses the Post Office of dragging its heels when it comes to the inquiry, Davey is still getting off lightly for the part he played in allowing the scandal to continue on his watch. Mind you, it is the standard routine these days that nobody in public office holds their hands up and admits they got it wrong and comes forward to take their punishment like a man (or woman). It’s never anybody’s fault.

39 sub-postmasters had their convictions quashed by the Court of Appeal in 2021, a hearing that revealed the Post Office had deliberately withheld vital documents from earlier High Court litigation, documents proving they were aware of Horizon’s imperfections in 2013; but so slow has the compensation process been that many have yet to receive payments; dozens of those accused have since passed away, having received nothing whatsoever. To date, 142 case reviews have been completed, though 54 convictions have been upheld; the human cost, let alone the financial one, has been devastating for those involved, though don’t expect the guilty to be brought to account any time soon. Where this outrage is concerned, it would appear only the innocent have so far been punished.

FRANZ BECKENBAUER (1945-2024)

Franz‘Beckenbauer was known in the game for running referees…he started having words with Kitabdjian, the referee, and to our total disbelief, the goal was ruled out.’ So said Peter Lorimer, the Scotsman with the thunderbolt in his foot, who scored more goals for Leeds United than any other player in the club’s history; he was speaking 40 years on from the infamous 1975 European Cup Final, recalling how his goal for Leeds against German cup-holders Bayern Munich was abruptly disallowed following an intervention by Bayern captain Franz Beckenbauer. ‘Der Kaiser’ had strolled over to the ref when Lorimer had put the ball in the back of the net and suggested he have a word with the linesman, who hadn’t raised his flag and had already returned to the halfway line; despite having initially pointed to the centre circle – indicating a goal – the ref suddenly changed his mind and decided Billy Bremner had been offside; no goal. This incident played its part in enabling Bayern to end up winning the game 2-0 and retaining the trophy they went on to win again a year later, ensuring a hat-trick of victories and putting them on a par with past record-breakers in the competition like Real Madrid and Ajax.

Beckenbauer had tried to influence the referee in the previous year’s World Cup Final, but Englishman Jack Taylor was having none of it when he awarded Holland a successfully-converted penalty against home side West Germany in the first minute. Then again, Der Kaiser didn’t get to the level he played at for the best part of 20 years by being a choir-boy; every successful team of his footballing era combined greatness with gamesmanship, and there’s no doubt that both the Bayern Munich club side he played as sweeper for and the West German national side he achieved 103 caps with oozed talent – Gerd Muller, Gunter Netzer, Paul Breitner, Sepp Maier, to name but a few. That West Germany team was arguably the best the country has ever produced, winning the European Championships in 1972 and the World Cup in 1974 before Beckenbauer hung up his international boots and chased the big bucks in the glamorous North American Soccer League. He later took West Germany to the 1986 World Cup Final as manager (when they lost to Argentina) and went one better by winning it in 1990 (against Argentina). On the global stage, he remained perhaps the most respected and revered player the country has ever produced, one of the first names on the team-sheet when it comes to listing the greatest footballers of all-time (not to mention one of the few defenders), and his death at the age of 78, just days after the passing of Brazil legend Mario Zagallo, ensures the age he graced recedes even further from memory.

© The Editor

Website: https://www.johnnymonroe.co.uk/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?fan_landing=true&u=56665294

THE ROAD TO DOWNING STREET

Starmer StardustSince the official resignation date of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister on 6 September last year, there have been nine by-elections in the UK and the Conservative Party has triumphed in only one of them – Boris’s old seat of Uxbridge and South Ruislip back in July; and of the nine, five had been constituencies held by Tories. The roll-call of other winners reads seven to Labour and one to the Lib Dems – and one of those Labour victories was stolen from the SNP, at Rutherglen and Hamilton West earlier this month. All of the Labour wins are as much reflective of the state of the parties that lost their seats as they are of any sudden upsurge of faith in Keir Starmer’s collective, with the SNP’s own crumbling condition north of the border as perilous as that of the Conservative Party south of it. Three of the Labour wins, after all, were in safe Labour seats they already held, with the trio of by-elections prompted by resignations. The two triumphs Labour enjoyed last Thursday night, including the record-breaking win in Mid Bedfordshire (which turned out to be the largest numerical majority ever overturned in British by-election history), were provoked by the resignations of a pair of discredited Tory MPs who were discredited for very different reasons.

In Tamworth, Chris Pincher had stood down following revelations of his wandering hands – with an ill-advised endorsement by Boris being one of the final nails in Johnson’s Prime Ministerial coffin; and in Mid Bedfordshire, the terminally-cuckoo Nadine Dorries had reluctantly walked the plank when it belatedly dawned on her that all that licking of Boris’s arse wasn’t going to guarantee her the God-given peerage she imagined she was entitled to. Her sole achievement as a Member of Parliament appears to have been delivering the safest of Tory seats to the Labour party for the first time since the constituency’s creation in 1918; up until last Thursday Mid Bedfordshire had only twice been out of Conservative hands in its 105 years of existence, on both occasions falling to the old Liberals back in the 1920s. That’s some achievement, Mad Nad. Mind you, from all accounts she was something of an absentee, the definitively useless constituency MP with her eyes fixed on promotion to the Lords as opposed to her constituents’ concerns – which makes her failure to acquire a seat in the first-class carriage of the ultimate gravy train all the more sweeter.

One does wonder, though, if it won’t even take a miscreant like Chris Pincher or a deluded fruitcake like Nadine Dorries for this recent pattern to be replicated come the next General Election; the chronic unpopularity and absolute mistrust of the governing party has accelerated since Partygate, which might suggest we could be poised to see the demolition of the ‘Blue Wall’ next time round. The rise of tactical voting as a means of ensuring sitting Tory MPs are ousted, regardless of whether Labour or the Lib Dems end up being the victors, has paid off handsomely for the opposition, though it again implies it’s not so much a belief in Keir Starmer or Ed Davey as the men to pull us out of the ditch the Tories have dragged us into as it is an unswerving determination to simply get rid of the Tories, period. The Conservative Party suffered a double humiliation on Thursday evening, on the losing side of two of the most comprehensive defeats any party in government has ever experienced; and it’s increasingly difficult to see what the Tories can do to reverse this downward trend. A constant chopping and changing at the top doesn’t seem to make much difference, and even if General Elections traditionally see voters revert to their default choices rather than resorting to the bloody nose techniques commonplace in by-elections, a general exhaustion with the Tories feels incurable right now.

Understandably, Sir Keir made the most of his party’s pair of historic victories, claiming the Mid Bedfordshire win was a ‘game changer’ before going on to add, ‘I know there are people who probably voted Tory in the past who voted for a changed Labour Party this time because they despair at the state of their own party…Labour is the party of the future, the party of national renewal.’ I suspect he also knows any party in government for a decade or more always seems worn-out and devoid of ideas by the end, no matter how many times they try and paper over the cracks by changing their leader; an entire generation of first-time voters tends to fall for the freshness of the opposition in such circumstances, whereas long-time voters are so disillusioned by the broken promises of 13 years that they opt for the other side again. This weariness with an administration that will inevitably be held responsible for the notable decline in living standards – particularly since the pandemic – suggests giving Labour a go in 2024 (or ’25) is a fairly unstoppable trend now, despite the ongoing lack of enthusiasm for Starmer himself.

The ‘incident’ that occurred during his speech at the Labour Party conference and briefly usurped the latest Israel/Palestine conflict from the leading headlines was one whereby an archetypal posh boy activist probably called Toby or Tarquin or Ptolemy had a suspicious amount of time to shower Starmer in glitter before security got their hands on him; claimed by some to have been a staged stunt intended to give the Labour leader a more ‘manly’ image, Starmer certainly didn’t panic – though he avoided resorting to a John Prescott-type response, something which would undoubtedly have improved his masculine credentials if presenting a few problems in our more squeamish era. Actually, it had the unintentionally amusing effect of momentarily making Starmer resemble an awkward hybrid of Gary Glitter and Alvin Stardust, what with Sir Keir already in possession of an expertly-quaffed barnet straight from the Glam Rock salon; true to form, Starmer didn’t then regale the audience with a quick burst of ‘My Coo Ca Choo’, which I guess would have put a smile on the face of a few floating voters if nothing else.

Perhaps it’s telling that this incident is the one thing anyone will remember from this year’s conference season, rather than Starmer delivering a speech peppered with ear-catching buzzwords and sound-bites of the kind Tony Blair copyrighted at the 1996 Labour Party Conference, his last as Leader of the Opposition. I remember watching that speech live on TV at the time and it did really feel as though he was destined for office the following spring. I’m not sure anyone watched Starmer’s speech this year and felt the same on the strength of the speech and the leader; but they maybe feel Sir Keir will be residing at No.10 sometime soon solely because hatred towards the Government is so intense, and he is the only realistic alternative as Prime Minister when it comes down to it. The incumbent resident of that address was out of the country doing his bit for peace in the Middle East when his party crashed and burned in Tamworth and Mid Bedfordshire, but he returned home to be confronted by further evidence of the Tories’ unpopularity. Sunak arguably faces a far stiffer task than Starmer, despite his own absence of charisma being mirrored in his opponent.

BOBBY CHARLTON (1937-2023)

Bobby CharltonHard to believe, but sadly true now. Of the eleven men who won the World Cup for England in 1966, only one of the team is still with us – Sir Geoff Hurst. That other remaining knight who had clung on for so long despite his evident frailty in recent years has passed away at the age of 86, Sir Bobby Charlton. Unlike many of his team-mates that day, however, his achievement 57 years ago didn’t completely overshadow his other considerable achievements on the pitch. As a teenage prodigy breaking into the celebrated ‘Busby Babes’ in the mid-50s, Charlton swiftly became an integral member of that legendary side and one of the lucky few to survive the devastating Munich air crash that wiped out half the team in 1958. Older brother Jack, who would eventually join Bobby in the England line-up, often claimed his kid brother was never quite the same person after Munich, which is understandable, but Bobby went on to form the core of a second great Man U side in the 60s, playing in a peerless midfield alongside Denis Law and George Best. After the emotional capture of the European Cup in 1968, that team – which had twice won the League during the decade – embarked on a slow decline and Charlton played his last game at Old Trafford in 1973. After a brief spell in management at Preston, Charlton spent many years as a TV pundit and global ambassador for the game. He was only the second man to gain a century of caps for England, played at three World Cups for his country, and held the record as England’s leading goal-scorer for 45 years; he was probably the most gifted player of his generation and certainly one of the finest ever to pull on an England shirt. And, lest we forget, he more or less gave his name to an unforgettable haircut.

© The Editor

Website: https://www.johnnymonroe.co.uk/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?fan_landing=true&u=56665294

ONE IN A MILLION

Trevor Francis 2Approximately 45 years and the best part of a million miles away from the aggressive product-endorsement industry of the here and now, an ad appeared in the 1970s and 80s boy’s Bible of the beautiful game, ‘Shoot!’ magazine; the tagline was ‘A Close Shave for Trevor’ and featured Nottingham Forest and England forward Trevor Francis promoting a brand of razorblade lost to the mists of memory. Bearing a closer resemblance to the kind of ads non-smoker Stanley Matthews fronted for Craven ‘A’ cigarettes in the 1950s, the ad in question inexplicably re-entered my consciousness yesterday when I heard Francis had died of a heart attack at the criminally-premature age of 69. Yes, footballers were promoting consumer goods long before the present day wrote it into their contracts, but they did so back then with a refreshingly amateurish cheesiness that feels curiously charming in retrospect; they looked almost embarrassed to do so, as though endorsing a product unrelated to their profession was somehow ‘selling out’. Francis may have been British football’s first million-pound signing, but I should imagine his wages were no higher than those of his team-mates at Notts Forest; subject to the often-petty eccentricities of the man who signed him in 1979, Brian Clough, Francis reluctantly plugged products as a means of embellishing his income. He may have been a European Cup winner, but that didn’t necessarily project him into the jet-set at the turn of the 80s.

Sadly, a fair few cover stars from the heyday of ‘Shoot!’ have had the final whistle blown on them over the last couple of years – Frank Worthington and Gordon McQueen to name just two; and Trevor Francis is the latest addition to a worryingly-lengthening list of childhood heroes to remind those who once pinned their pictures to their bedroom walls that extra-time isn’t indefinite. A lot of what has been said since Francis’s death was announced suggests he failed to fulfil the potential he showed when hitting the headlines by scoring four goals in one game for Birmingham City against Bolton Wanderers when just 16 in 1970; the hype surrounding Francis when he dramatically emerged as an adolescent one-to-watch implied he was following in the footsteps of Jimmy Greaves and Peter Osgood as an explosive teenage talent destined for greatness, though the fact the West Country boy wasn’t playing for one of the title-chasing teams of the early 70s such as Leeds, Liverpool or Derby County perhaps postponed the inevitable England call-up, and Francis didn’t play his first game for his country until 1977.

After several seasons as the stand-out player for a team struggling to survive amongst the First Division big boys, Francis was finally recruited to a club competing for honours; the short journey from the West to East Midlands took him to Nottingham Forest in February 1979. Forest had presented a serious challenge to the over-dominant Liverpool the year before by capturing both the League title and the League Cup, and the following season they were pursuing the Holy Grail of the European Cup back when a team had to win its domestic championship in order to qualify rather than finishing third or fourth. Francis made his European debut for his new club in the Final itself, against surprise Swedish opposition Malmo; his header from a cross by John Robertson turned out to be the sole goal of the game, though any suggestions by the press that Francis had paid back his transfer fee were rubbished by the characteristically contrarian Clough; one almost felt that the chip on Clough’s shoulder that he retained from the cruel curtailment of his own playing career at the age of just 29 was occasionally manifested as resentment towards players he felt had had it easy by contrast.

The previous record signing between English clubs prior to Francis had been a month before, when David Mills had moved from Middlesbrough to West Brom for £516,000; breaking the bank by signing Francis meant Clough had placed an unprecedented pressure on the striker’s shoulders, though injuries prevented Francis from enjoying the kind of career at Forest that his fee justified, missing out on 1980’s European Cup Final (which they won). After a couple of summer spells in America’s NASL with Detroit Express, Francis became a million-pound player for the second time when he signed for Manchester City in September 1981. However, the Man City of 1981 were a different proposition to the all-conquering Man City of 2023, and the club couldn’t really afford a signing of such proportions at the time, let alone of a player plagued by injuries. Despite domestic dramas, Francis continued to be an automatic name when it came to England and he was a vital member of the squad heading for the country’s first World Cup tournament in 12 years.

At España ’82 Francis vindicated his selection for the England team by scoring in the group games against both Czechoslovakia and Kuwait, though couldn’t find the back of the net thereafter, and England exited the competition unbeaten at a time when the structure of the tournament enabled such anomalies to occur. By the start of the 1982/83 season, Francis was tempted by the prospect of wages the Football League couldn’t afford and decided to ply his trade on the Continent by joining Italian side Sampdoria; he was hardly unique at the time, finding himself playing alongside ex-Liverpool captain Graeme Souness when he signed for the club; after four years, he moved to Atalanta. Despite playing out of his skin against Scotland in 1986, Francis failed to be selected for the England squad destined for the Mexico World Cup that summer, and he ended his international career on 52 caps and a dozen goals. On the domestic front, he was signed by former team-mate Souness when the combative Scot took charge of Glasgow Rangers, and managed to add the Scottish League Cup to his trophy cabinet before heading south of the border to join Queens Park Rangers in 1988.

At the age of 34, Francis became player-manager for a brief spell at QPR and then joined Sheffield Wednesday as a player under Ron Atkinson, where he won the League Cup. Francis was promoted to player-manager at Hillsborough following Atkinson’s departure in 1991 and made an instant impact, guiding the club to the dizzying heights of third in the First Division and to both domestic Cup Finals in 1993, despite losing the pair of them to Arsenal. Francis finally hung up his boots after almost a quarter of a century in 1994 and was dismissed as manager by Wednesday the following year. He then returned to Birmingham City, but couldn’t manage to claw them out of football’s second tier, despite leading them to the League Cup Final in 2001; a final stab at management, this time with Crystal Palace, was met with similar failure to reach the Promised Land of the Premier League, and Trevor Francis walked away from the game at the age of 49.

Trevor Francis maintained a relatively low profile for the last 20 years of his life, living out his retirement years in Spain whilst remaining a fondly-recalled figure from the last era of English football before the money-men moved in and transformed the game beyond recognition. That he himself had inadvertently played a part in that slow transformation by being the game’s first million-pound player didn’t grant him the kind of lifestyle that is second nature to today’s so-called superstars, so he stands as a figure with a foot in two different ages of the national game, arriving too late to financially benefit from the age he ushered-in by default. That said, his untimely passing is one that will nonetheless be marked by men of a certain age for whom Francis at his playing peak in that classic England kit introduced by Don Revie will always be a key element in the faded wallpaper of yesteryear.

© The Editor

Website: https://www.johnnymonroe.co.uk/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?fan_landing=true&u=56665294

Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/843169827

CROSS-CHANNEL DOLLY

Jane BirkinIn the early months of 1984, Big Brother took the shape of Mike Read; at the time, the bespectacled, mullet-haired DJ was the host of the Radio 1 breakfast show as well as BBC1’s ‘Saturday Superstore’, and a regular presenter on ‘Top of the Pops’; he seemed to be the heir to Edmonds and bore all the egotistical hallmarks of a B-list celebrity fortunate to be operating in an arena boasting huge audience figures. When a record entered the charts by an unknown band with the odd name of Frankie Goes To Hollywood, Mike was offended by the sleeve’s blatant gay iconography as well as some of the suggestive slang phrases peppered throughout the song, which was called ‘Relax’; back then, it was possible to be offended by such things and not be sacked on the spot for homophobia. Anyway, Mike declared on air that he would not be playing ‘Relax’, and such was his moral clout at the Beeb, the rest of Radio 1 followed suit; despite being played regularly until Mike intervened, the record was no longer to be heard on Radio 1. Of course, thanks to the publicity, ‘Relax’ climbed all the way to No.1, reducing TOTP to a farce when the show couldn’t even climax with the best-selling record of the moment. In 1984, however, I wasn’t aware this had happened before – albeit 15 years before (which was a virtual lifetime ago to the 16-year-old I was then).

In the highly appropriate year of ’69, the first banned chart-topper of the pop era was also the first foreign language record to hit No.1 in the UK. The alien lingo could’ve enabled the artist to get away with murder had his co-vocalist not pouted her way through the track and then embellished it with the kind of orgasmic heavy breathing guaranteed to get the Vatican hot under the collar – which it did, so much so that it was denounced by the Pope, probably at the same time he was turning a blind eye to the far more dubious activities of some of his priests. As with ‘Relax’ 15 years later – albeit on an international scale – ‘Je T’Aime Moi Non Plus’ by Serge Gainsbourg and Jane Birkin was a huge success thanks to the disapproval of the old guard and their attempts to silence it. Gainsbourg was a household name in his native France – and had already penned a Eurovision winner – though it took this duet with his then-partner to put him on the pop map of the Anglosphere.

Swinging London ingénue Jane Birkin was establishing herself as a movie star in the mid-60s, giving British cinema one of its first full-frontal nude scenes in 1966’s ‘Blow-Up’; after a brief marriage to composer John Barry whilst still a teenager, Birkin met Serge Gainsbourg when they appeared together in the French film, ‘Slogan’. Gainsbourg had recorded the original version of the song destined for notoriety with Brigitte Bardot, but the sex kitten’s husband was so outraged by the end result that he pressurised Gainsbourg into not releasing it. For one of the few times in his professional life, the infamous agent-provocateur of Gallic pop bowed to the pressure and shelved the salacious song; when he began a relationship with Birkin, however, he decided to re-record it with her. Whereas Bardot sounded very much like a fully-grown woman on the original, Birkin sounded more like a schoolgirl, which appealed to Gainsbourg’s sense of the perverse. With its lush orchestral backing and Chopin-like melody, the addition of Birkin’s voice created a unique listening experience that would cast a long shadow over the rest of her career.

She also lent her vocals to what is undoubtedly Gainsbourg’s greatest achievement, the 1971 album, ‘Histoire de Melody Nelson’; but she thereafter mainly tried to focus on acting, eventually splitting from Gainsbourg in 1980. Perhaps their finest musical legacy is their daughter Charlotte, who has proven to be an exceptional talent in her own right. Although awarded an OBE in 2001, Birkin was a prominent Francophile for most of her adult life, living on the other side of the Channel for the best part of fifty years; indeed, her death at the age of 76 yesterday (following a stroke in 2021) provoked tributes led by none other than Monsieur President himself. Even if over here Jane Birkin is chiefly remembered for one pop cultural contribution above any other, that solitary hit still trumps the output of many acts with dozens of hits to their names. And some never even manage the one.


RacquetTHE KING IS DEAD, LONG LIVE THE KING

Looking back on the shock moment in 1981 when Bjorn Borg’s five-year dominance of the Centre Court came to an end at the hands of John McEnroe, a veteran US commentator at Wimbledon compared the changing of the guard to the death of Queen Victoria. Yesterday, defending champion Novak Djokovic saw his failure to emulate the Swede’s five consecutive singles’ titles herald another passing-on of the torch as arguably the greatest tennis player of all time came unstuck courtesy of a Spaniard 16 years his junior. A trio of titans have ruled over tennis for most of Carlos Alcaraz’s entire lifetime, though the rapid rise of Alcaraz from young contender to grand slam winner has given a men’s game in sore need of fresh blood a long-overdue shot in the arm. Yet Alcaraz was up against a 36-year-old looking to not only equal Borg’s record; the Serb colossus was also after his eighth overall singles title at SW19 as well as seeking his 24th major, which would have put him ahead of every male tennis player to have preceded him. Djokovic hadn’t lost a match on Centre Court for a full ten years, not since Andy Murray beat him in the final back in 2013, and it was increasingly difficult to imagine anyone doing likewise again.

The fact Djokovic had already won both the Australian and French Opens this year made a mockery of his age, and even a Speedy Gonzales of a 20-year-old was surely destined to crumble when confronted by this immovable mountain of a man. As it turned out, the challenger toppled the champ after a stumbling start in which he’d been blitzed by the kind of ruthless display Djokovic has been subjecting his opponents to ever since his first Wimbledon win in 2011; Alcaraz was blown away 6-1 in the first set, won the second on a tie-break, then took the third with the reverse of the score-line that had humiliated him in the first. Alcaraz’s inexperience in the cauldron of a final at Wimbledon required him to find his feet quickly lest Djokovic run away with another title, and by taking a two sets-to-one lead, it seemed he’d done precisely that. A British crowd always sides with the underdog, and the rapturous cheers that greeted every point won by Alcaraz clearly irked his opposite number; the Serb has often felt the respect audiences have for him has never been accompanied by love, and several sarcastic gestures on his part highlighted how this fact remains a niggling thorn in his side whenever his opponent has the upper hand.

At one incendiary moment, a frustrated Djokovic even evoked the spirit of Super Brat by smashing his racquet against the net post and leaving it resembling one of Pete Townshend’s guitars after a 60s Who gig. However, one of Novak Djokovic’s strengths is that he can channel his frustration at being cast as the villain into his game, and it appeared as though the script was running to form when he won the fourth set 6-3. A fifth set was what the final everyone wanted needed, so the world’s No.1 (Alcaraz) and the world’s No.2 (Djokovic) took it to the limit. Perhaps the age difference between the two finally told in the end, for even though Djokovic presented more of a challenge to Alcaraz than 39-year-old Ken Rosewall had been to 21-year-old Jimmy Connors in the 1974 final, the athleticism of youth won out – along with a precociously gifted talent that seems destined to dominate the game for the next decade or so. As the current holder of two of tennis’s four grand slams, it would be premature to write off Djokovic just yet; but the fact the younger man now holds the other two suggests a potentially exhilarating rivalry that will be fun to watch while it lasts – which will hopefully be a little longer than the age gap implies.

© The Editor

Website: https://www.johnnymonroe.co.uk/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?fan_landing=true&u=56665294

Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/843169827

SILLY POINT

Bairstow and TwatWhether a hangover from the ‘let it all hang out’ mantra in evidence at numerous outdoor pop festivals in the early 70s or simply a symptom of bored narcissists acting the clown, when streaking became a craze in 1974 it was…erm…stripped of any ‘radical’ hippie associations and was instead regarded as the latest gimmick of the attention-seeking prankster. After all, by the mid-70s, most gestures that had possessed a politically radical edge in the late 60s had well and truly had those edges smoothed out; and deciding to run onto the field naked at a packed stadium was seen as more Benny Hill than Woodstock, something to laugh at rather than be viewed as symbolic of the decline and fall of Western civilization. Ray Stevens’ chart-topping 1974 hit, ‘The Streak’ was very much in this vein, being the archetypal 70s comedy record and not exactly a ‘protest song’. After a bearded streaker was captured on camera being escorted from the pitch at Twickenham in April of that year – and a conscientious policeman had famously invented a novel new use for his helmet – many top sporting events covered on television suddenly appeared to attract chaps prone to getting their kit off in public. And it was primarily chaps who were into this streaking lark; Erika Roe’s 15 minute-stint in the spotlight at Twickenham in 1982 was something of an anomaly.

Obviously, streaking in Britain was primarily a summer sport, which meant it honed in on venues hosting cricket. No game seemed more susceptible to streaking than cricket. An especially unforgettable example of John Arlott’s masterful ability to cope with the unexpected occurred at Lord’s in 1975, when a streaker interrupted play between England and Australia. Despite strangely referring to the streaker as a ‘freaker’, Arlott responded to the sudden apparition by declaring, ‘And it’s masculine, and I would think it’s seen the last of its cricket for the day.’ Television producers – and viewers – were less squeamish back then; cameras didn’t cut away with the commentator issuing an apology along the lines of ‘Well, we’re sure the viewers at home don’t want to see that’; no, the whole performance was beamed into the nation’s living rooms as a comedy interlude far more entertaining than rain stopping play; I also have a memory of the moment when the streaker leapt over the wicket even being incorporated into the opening titles of the highlights programme at the time.

Streaking has experienced occasional revivals over the years, but along with flared trousers and platform heels, it’s never really caught on in quite the same way as first time round. There was a lone wolf who routinely indulged around 20-25 years ago, most memorably at the 2003 UEFA Cup Final in Seville; as Glasgow Celtic were finalists, the game was televised live on the BBC, though the commentator had to emphasise the BBC was using a feed from Spanish TV when the streaker appeared and his charge around the pitch as the police gave chase was tracked by the cameras. The Spaniards clearly didn’t regard a silly man interrupting proceedings with his tackle on display as something to induce cardiac arrests in those tuning-in across Europe, unlike the BBC’s ‘it’s got nothing to do with us’ disclaimer. The character in question making a habit of regularly streaking at prominent sporting events made it look as though he was a professional with a premeditated plan rather than an amateur responding spontaneously to favourable conditions, so his actions were different to those that had provided light relief in the 70s.

As stated previously, streaking had no radical elements to it, let alone political ones; interruptions to sport that have a political agenda are a different beast altogether. The likes of Suffragette Emily Davison at the 1913 Derby is too distant to trace a straight line to the modern era, but perhaps the first such protests of a manner we’d find familiar today occurred during UK tours by the South African rugby and cricket teams in 1969 and 1970, when the British Anti-Apartheid movement (including South African exile and future Labour Minister Peter Hain) took direct action at a time when governments were still reluctant to impose the blanket ban on South Africa’s sportsmen and women that came into force just a few years later. Despite strong opposition in some quarters, most recognised the iniquities of racially-divided societies in South Africa and Rhodesia for what they were and the Anti-Apartheid protests could be said to have helped bring about an expulsion from international competition that eventually led to the end of those regimes – even if it took a good few years. Recently, there’s been a resurrection of direct action at sporting events, though – unlike the Anti-Apartheid protests – any sympathy with the promoters of the cause in question rests very much with the minority as opposed to the majority.

Whereas a public sector union on strike can disrupt the lives of the public when taking industrial action, there is nevertheless always a degree of support amongst some members of that public re the unions’ grievance, and it is the Government stalling on a pay rise that is largely viewed as the enemy. This isn’t the case when it comes to the likes of those who disrupt the lives of the public with protests unrelated to issues the ordinary man and woman in the street can directly relate to, such as the cost of living. The ‘end of the world is nigh’ hysteria of the kind that largely emanates from privileged middle-class ‘activists’ with a somewhat patrician attitude towards people bereft of their privileges is not likely to inspire much sympathy; if anything, it inspires anger and diminishes wider support for a cause that already seems fairly abstract, a product of the crystal ball rather than something as immediate and tangible as a supermarket receipt recording rising prices.

Having disrupted play at the World Snooker Championships as well as the Grand National and the Derby lately, yesterday the Ptolemy and Titania brigade made their presence felt at Lord’s. Almost 50 years ago, play in an Ashes Test was momentarily halted at the same location due to a daft man in the nuddy; half-a-century later, the entirely humourless idiot sons of the Climate Change industry invaded the pitch, the Just Stop Oil soothsayers with their tiresome orange powder trick yet again. Cockney geezers protesting against the imprisonment of George Davis caused an Ashes Test to be cancelled at Headingley in 1975 by pouring paint on the pitch overnight; this time round, attempts to reach the pitch during an actual match were thwarted by swift security men, not to mention England wicketkeeper Jonny Bairstow showing impressive physical prowess by carrying one of the protestors away. As with every other stunt of this nature to have been staged in recent months, most are pretty sick of the sight of Just Stop Oil and their antics; how many have been converted as a consequence? Answers, I suspect, on a very small postcard.

The philistine goons with the silver spoons in their mouths who went through a phase of defacing great works of art at galleries a few months back in a way demonstrated just how clueless these posh eco-activists are. The Art world is on the same wavelength as them, after all, teeming with curators who loathe the collections they are supposed to be looking after and who denigrate Britain’s artistic heritage as symbolic of racism and colonialism and slavery and so on and so on. Equally, the corporate world of sport is increasingly in thrall to a certain ideological dogma it rarely misses a moment to shove down the throat of the punter weary of being lectured to. But it is the punter that keeps these sports in business, and one can hardly expect him or her to respond with favour to having yet another lecture – albeit one manifested as a protest – interrupting the enjoyment of something representing one of the few escapes from the day-to-day grind still remaining to them. If we are to have pitch invasions, at least give us a laugh and get yer kit off.

© The Editor

Website: https://www.johnnymonroe.co.uk/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?fan_landing=true&u=56665294

Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/824916098

THE FINAL FURLONG

Red Rum StatueI visited Aintree last year – well, I had a brief stop-off waiting for a train to Liverpool. Across the road from the station is a certain sporting temple most people associate with a specific annual event. The racecourse has been there for almost 200 years, which goes to show how horseracing predates most popular sports in this country, the majority of which were codified and turned professional much later, during the Victorian period. As with the sole occasion in which I attended a football match at the old Wembley stadium around 40 years ago, whenever setting eyes upon a venue one has been aware of via TV coverage all of one’s life, it’s hard not to be a tad awestruck for a moment. Seeing Aintree Racecourse merely from the outside was enough to summon up all those childhood memories of watching Red Rum’s trio of Grand National victories; catch the wind a certain way and no doubt it’d be possible to hear the rapid fire of Peter O’Sullevan’s breathless commentary again, a style which performance poet John Cooper Clarke once admitted to be an influence on his own machine gun delivery.

For those who don’t follow horseracing religiously, the Grand National is probably the only race they watch all year. Choosing a horse to cheer on and maybe even placing a bet is all part of the experience, especially if it’s something entered into just once every twelve months; for such part-timers, there’s a fun element absent from the dedicated online gambler and betting shop drop-out, whose entire future fortunes hinge upon desperately trying to predict the outcome of daily race meetings that have no impact whatsoever on the casual Grand National viewer. As one of this nation’s so-called ‘Crown Jewel’ sporting occasions ring-fenced for continuous coverage on terrestrial television, the Grand National holds something of a special place in the TV calendar, even if – as with many sports – the stakes surrounding such a high-profile spectacle can often prove fatal to its participants.

A bone broken by a severe tackle can curtail the career of a professional footballer overnight; a head injury to a rugby player or boxer can lead to brain damage; a Formula One driver’s raison d’être is to drive at the kind of speeds that considerably increase the possibility of crashing his vehicle and ending his life. Everyone who selects these sports as a profession knows the potential pitfalls before they start, but they go for it anyway, because they’re prepared to take the risk and figure it probably won’t happen to them. A jockey is equally conscious of the particular risks he faces should something go wrong, yet he decides to opt for horseracing as a career regardless; but can the same be said of the horse he rides? A horse doesn’t weigh up the pros and cons of racing and then decide whether or not to do it for a living; of course none of these factors apply to an animal. How can they? Every decision is naturally made for them by human trainers and human owners; they are the ones who assess all the risks that their horse faces. And, as loose horses whose riders have been unsaddled during races demonstrate, once they’ve been trained to run alongside other horses on a racecourse it’s impossible for them to resist the urge, jockey or no.

Racehorses are amongst some of the most pampered animals on the planet – and yes, I include toy dogs carried in the handbags of vacuous starlets and cats whose owners organise their daily routines to suit their feline overlord. Compared to sad old nags condemned to chew grass in empty fields, racehorses are spoiled and privileged A-list celebrities residing in luxurious surroundings, with their every whim attended to by stable-boys, trainers, owners and vets; recipients of the highest standards of animal welfare, they enjoy the finest of diets and get more exercise a day than most people manage in a month. Yes, many are simply viewed as financial investments and cash cows, but in order for them to attain such status they have to receive the kind of TLC that would be the envy of any other animal were they able to have a chat in the manner of a poorly-paid employee discovering how much more a work colleague is earning. Nobody involved in horseracing neglects or mistreats their horses if they want them to win races; they know they have to look after them – and they do. Unfortunately where racehorses are concerned, no amount of exemplary care and attention can insure against accident and injury in the sporting arena.

When a horse is injured during a race and has to be put down, all of the people whose lives are dedicated to ensuring their horse has a long and successful career are devastated. Two horses sadly lost their lives at Aintree on Saturday, following on from another death during the three-day racing festival; alas, as with the risks confronting the participants in the other sports previously mentioned, these things do sometimes happen. The argument of the animal rights activists who disrupted this year’s Grand National is that the horse – unlike the human – has no choice; the horse goes into a potentially dangerous environment utterly oblivious and is being sacrificed to feed the greed of man, whether owner or punter. Horseracing is not a blood sport, but the activist insists there is blood on the hands of all who promote and perpetuate it.

Protests at flagship race meetings – especially the higher-risk steeplechase events – are no new thing; but recent innovations utilised by protestors whose cause tends to be that of climate change appear to have become commonplace tactics, whatever the issue. Aintree Racecourse is a vast area of land that presents police with a considerable challenge when every inch of it needs to be combed to keep out unwelcome visitors, and it was inevitable on Saturday that a small handful breached the barriers and attempted to glue themselves to one of the fences on the race’s route. The protestors did somewhat make the police’s job easier by advertising their intentions in advance when they gleefully accepted ‘the oxygen of publicity’ generously offered them by the MSM in the build-up to the race; and it also helped that they all wore the same distinctive pink uniforms that stood out against the otherwise emerald backdrop. 118 arrests were made throughout the day as protests also took place on the M57, where adhesives were once again employed to ensure activists stuck to the carriageway.

However much the protestors enjoyed themselves at Aintree and relished the anticipated martyr’s money-shot of being cuffed by scuffers, the kind of stunts staged on Saturday are essentially counterproductive in terms of recruiting newcomers to the cause, testing the patience of even those who might actually be sympathetic to that cause; and it has to be said that the overwhelming impression given that anyone who refers to themselves as an ‘activist’ in the loudest voice seems to always be an annoyingly posh and privileged prig doesn’t help either; it just gets people’s backs up. Moreover, the fact that the 15-minute delay to the race’s start due to the protestors running onto the course meant the horses were kept walking round in circles under a blazing sun, causing them unnecessary distress when they were primed to be under starter’s orders, rather contradicted the protestors’ message. Is it really about the welfare of the animals involved or is it really about attention-seeking narcissists with too much time on their privately-educated hands?

Between them, the Jockey Club and the British Horseracing Authority have made great strides in improving the safety for horses at racecourses over the past few years, particularly at Aintree, where some of the more fearsome fences have been modified and reduced in height as well as ditches narrowed and parts of the course widened to enable horses to bypass the fences if they don’t feel like jumping them; on-course veterinary facilities have also greatly improved. Short of axing the event altogether, it’s hard to know what else can be done to appease critics whilst continuing to please those for whom the Grand National is the world’s greatest steeplechase and one of this country’s premier sporting occasions. It seems it will continue to provoke passions on either side of the argument with not even a photo finish on hand to decide the winner.

© The Editor

Website: https://www.johnnymonroe.co.uk/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?fan_landing=true&u=56665294

Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/807270946

A TALE OF TWO AUNTIES

BBC SingersFor those not in the know, the BBC Singers are the UK’s sole professional chamber choir; perhaps lack of competition has enabled this ensemble to remain a revered fixture of the country’s Classical furniture for the best part of a century, but it also means people take notice when such unique BBC employees feel the brunt of their employer’s diminishing commitment to the highbrow. A couple of years ago, it was announced that the BBC Concert Orchestra would be dispatched to the wilds of the provinces as yet another token gesture in the ongoing (and increasingly tedious) operation to make the Beeb less ‘London-centric’; but this week an even more dispiriting sign of these BBC times came with the announcement that the BBC Singers are to be disbanded before the start of this year’s Proms, just a year before reaching their landmark 100th birthday; another penny-pinching body blow to the declining morale of these unsung old retainers was the announcement that salaries for members of the English BBC orchestras will be slashed by 20%.

Axing the BBC Singers was described in one newspaper article as an ‘act of vandalism’; BBC DG Tim Davie was the recipient of a joint letter penned by several Classical luminaries, declaring the intended cuts to be ‘irreversible and catastrophically damaging plans’; the BBC’s response reads: ‘Since 1922 we’ve been an integral part of the Classical music ecology in this country, and in order for us to continue to be a leading force in the industry, we need to modernise, make some necessary and difficult changes to the way we operate to ensure we are responding to audience needs and provide the best possible music to the widest possible audience.’ That statement just stops short of masking its meaning in Birt-speak buzzwords, but bearing in mind the self-destructive path the BBC seems determined to stick to, one wonders if their remaining ensembles will be restructured so that they will henceforth hire not on musical merit, but on box-ticking diversity/inclusivity grounds; perhaps ‘The BBC Rainbow Orchestra’ will eventually emerge from the ashes.

Naturally, the ominous spectre of the licence fee looms over every bumbling move the BBC makes these days as it struggles to justify its existence, and in the process has a habit of forgetting what made it special in the first place. The BBC’s nine musical ensembles may be a legacy of the old Reithian principles that regarded broadcasting as a moral mission to raise the artistic appreciation of the nation, and are viewed by some (especially within the BBC itself) as an anachronistic luxury; yet their continued presence in the face of the relentless dumbing-down that has characterised the Corporation in recent years has been something of a minor victory, particularly when compared to the fate of BBC4, a channel that for a good decade or more was the last remaining bastion of the Beeb’s once-peerless television output.

Now, rather than playing the long game of starving them out, the BBC has instead decided to disband its Singers in the same week as its somewhat kneejerk decision to hand a P45 to a grossly-overpaid star following the latest in a lengthy litany of gormless missives on social media. The fact the Beeb would have happily carried on paying Gary Lineker’s astronomical wages had his current comments on illegal immigrants not landed the Corporation in one more row with the Government that it could desperately do without says as much about its priorities as cutting the salaries of the BBC orchestras. Okay, so BBC TV’s football coverage commands far higher ratings than the listening figures for Radio 3; but we’re not talking about ITV or Channel 5, are we? Isn’t the BBC supposed to amount to more than merely chasing ratings?

Gary Lineker has been a bit of a repeat offender for quite some time; remembering I once wrote a post on here about his Twitter activities, I was surprised to learn when I tracked it down that it had been written as far back as December 2016; in a way, that shows just how long the BBC has tolerated his off-air utterances. As with Jeremy Clarkson before him, it seems the Beeb will allow the front-men of their most profitable franchises to get away with stretching the Corporation’s supposed ‘impartiality’ to breaking point for years until one incident too many provokes enough outraged headlines for a favourite son to be shown the door. I suppose the main difference between Lineker and Clarkson’s positions is that the latter was popular with that section of the viewing public the BBC disdains, whereas the former is a darling of all that the BBC bigwigs hold dear; one suspects they’d been keen to get rid of an embarrassment like Clarkson for years but didn’t dare, whilst losing Lineker was the last thing they wanted. However, unlike ‘Top Gear’ – which has failed to thrive since Clarkson’s departure – ‘Match of the Day’ will survive Gary Linker just as it survived David Coleman, Jimmy Hill and Des Lynam; viewers don’t tune in for the presenter or the pundits; they tune in to watch the games.

From all accounts, the entire commentary team of ‘Match of the Day’ have walked out in solidarity with Lineker; moreover, this Saturday’s edition will have neither presenter nor pundits as it seems Lineker’s sofa mafia have also downed tools and refused to work – although most of them, like Lineker himself, are essentially freelance anyway and routinely turn up on other broadcasters to cover matches the BBC hasn’t got the rights to anymore. Personally, I quite like the idea of ‘Match of the Day’ taking a ‘TOTP 2’ approach to coverage, with no host and no waffling ex-pros endlessly analysing what we’ve just seen. Who knows – it might work as a formula and we’ll be spared the inevitable Alex Scott inheriting the hot-seat. Anyway, as things stand, this move is not being officially regarded as permanent, though it’s hard to see a way back for Lineker with the BBC so terrified of offending a government that wants to take its own shears to the Beeb’s myriad tentacles.

The reactions to the comments that ultimately left the BBC with no choice but to give Gary Lineker the push mirror the polarisation of our times and highlight the dividing lines between those who applaud the compulsion of celebrities to virtue signal and those who deplore them doing so. One side praises Lineker and accuses the BBC of being spineless Tory lapdogs whilst the other claims the freedom the ex-footballer has had to make a mockery of BBC impartiality is symptomatic of the metropolitan Woke elite that forces its arrogant agenda down the throat of a viewing audience sick of being lectured to. Ironically, Piers Morgan, of all people, supported Lineker’s right to express his opinion (even if he disagreed with it) and argued it wasn’t a sackable offence, what with Lineker not being the host of a news programme. The culture wars do indeed occasionally throw up unlikely bedfellows.

It’s interesting that suspending a high-profile presenter of a popular programme provokes an across-the-board ‘everybody out’ attitude not just amongst BBC staff but at the equally PC Premier League, and provides further ammunition for social media soapboxes; it gives the impression that the BBC has been reduced to an ineffective supply teacher unable to exercise any authority over its unruly pupils. On the other hand, when it comes to a corner of the Corporation with a lower profile (albeit one with a far more distinguished history), the BBC can wield the axe unchallenged and protests are limited to the small albeit passionate circle of musicians directly affected. Perhaps these particular BBC employees don’t fit the profile the Beeb is keen to cultivate and consequently aren’t viewed as important – even if their gradual obliteration will do far more long-term damage to the Corporation’s dwindling reputation than the loss of Lineker ever will.

© The Editor

Website: https://www.johnnymonroe.co.uk/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?fan_landing=true&u=56665294

Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/797932964

GOOD SPORTS

Dickie DaviesFor a generation, Dickie Davies was the face of sport on television, whilst for more than one generation John Motson was the voice of one specific sport on the same medium; that both should pass away within a week of each other is one of those timely coincidences that often occur and make my job easier. A rather heartless admission, true, but the number of times a paucity for inspiration re a Winegum post is salvaged at the eleventh hour by the death of a famous face is remarkable; even the recent post covering the resignation of Nicola Sturgeon was eased by the passing of Raquel Welch being announced as I was writing it. On the eve of taking a week’s break and busy cursing Wee Nicola for intruding upon my preparations, hearing a celluloid sex symbol of old had shuffled off this mortal coil meant a post I hadn’t intended to write could be completed with a tad more haste than if I’d had to delve even further into the Krankie career to pad it out. So, yet again the Grim Reaper came to my rescue. And, as the march of time proceeds on its relentless pace, the collective childhood furniture is reshuffled once more and continues to become more threadbare as another pair bites the dust.

Dickie Davies fronted ‘World of Sport’ on ITV for 17 years, from 1968 until the Saturday afternoon rival to ‘Grandstand’ was axed in 1985. With his pseudo-Jason King moustache, sideburns and coiffed barnet combination (not forgetting the distinctive silver streak running through that admirable mane), Davies was one of the most instantly recognisable television personalities of his era, inspiring all the notable impressionists and comedians of the day to do their own take on the unmistakable image – the best being an especially memorable and characteristically bawdy interpretation by Benny Hill. Davies had come up through the regional ranks of ITV in the early 60s and by the time he became the permanent host of ‘World of Sport’ after a few years as understudy for the programme’s first frontman Eamonn Andrews, the show had carved a unique niche for itself in comparison to its competitor over on the BBC. With ‘Grandstand’ already marking a decade on air once Davies settled into the ‘World of Sport’ hot-seat, ITV’s rival had worked out a way to navigate the Beeb’s monopoly of major sporting events by promoting more obscure sports, none more so than wrestling.

The prospect of fat sweaty men in leotards throwing each other around the ring never sounded much like enticing entertainment on paper, yet ITV’s Saturday afternoon coverage made unlikely stars of the likes of Big Daddy, Giant Haystacks and Kendo Nagasaki and remains a more vivid memory in recollections amongst people of a certain age than whatever was showing over on ‘Grandstand’ at the same time. As with Frank Bough on ‘Grandstand’, Dickie Davies was the perfect safe pair of hands to link the various sports being covered, and the fact he was a permanent fixture in the nation’s living rooms for a decade and-a-half helped establish the programme as a lynchpin of the Saturday schedules as much as ‘Doctor Who’ or ‘Parkinson’. If you saw Dickie Davies on the screen, you knew what day of the week it was. As befitting a presenter on the more openly showbizzy commercial television, Davies also didn’t appear to take himself too seriously either, often sharing the screen with funny men like Eric Morecambe or Freddie Starr and even once appearing as himself in an episode of the early 70s Adam Faith drama, ‘Budgie’.

With the BBC owning football highlights with ‘Match of the Day’ on a Saturday night, ITV’s equivalent was a more scatty affair on a Sunday lunchtime, as each major ITV region had its own soccer show, meaning their commentators were less well-known nationwide than the BBC’s mainstays. Kenneth Wolstenholme was in possession of one of the most familiar voices in British broadcasting during his lengthy stint as the Corporation’s premier commentator on the national game, but by the early 70s Wolstenholme had gone and the likes of David Coleman and newcomer Barry Davies were being entrusted with the big games. Due to Britain being a three-channel television nation, there were naturally fewer jobs in TV sport to go round, and once these men reached the pinnacle of their profession by grabbing a seat behind the microphone they tended to stay there; in the process, their voices came to define the sports they covered. Think of cricket television coverage and one thinks of Jim Laker or Richie Benaud; pause for Formula One, and it’s still Murray Walker’s excitable tones one hears; Wimbledon – Dan Maskell; athletics – Ron Pickering; and so on. With football receiving more coverage than any other sport, there were a few more options, even in the 1970s, with Brian Moore ITV’s sole household name. In the wake of Kenneth Wolstenholme’s departure, however, the BBC needed a new voice; and in 1971, they found it.

John Motson emerged from the world of local newspapers before joining BBC radio and was quickly picked-up by BBC TV as back-up for Coleman and Davies; his voice was first heard on ‘Match of the Day’ in October 1971, but it was in February 1972 that Motson received his big break, commentating on what most anticipated would be a walkover for First Division Newcastle United when they turned up at non-League Hereford United for an FA Cup 3rd Round replay. After Newcastle took a predictable lead via hairy hit-man Malcolm MacDonald, Hereford midfielder Ronnie Radford launched a rocket that sailed over the quagmire of a pitch and into the back of the Newcastle net, taking the game into extra-time, which saw a shock 2-1 win for the home side. That Radford goal has been replayed every FA Cup 3rd Round weekend ever since, with Motson’s commentary as seared on the memory as the parka-clad kids invading the pitch.

Due to repeated plays of the Ronnie Radford rocket, Motson soon found himself being handed more prestigious matches and he eventually commentated on his first FA Cup Final in 1977, being handed the Wembley microphone as a permanent presence from 1979 onwards. As David Coleman left football and devoted more of his time to commentating on athletics and presenting ‘A Question of Sport’, Motson was promoted to the position of the Beeb’s main football voice; unlike his contemporaries – such as Barry Davies, who often commentated on the early rounds at Wimbledon – Motson was a one-sport man, something which enabled him to indulge in his nerdish obsession with statistics, the peppering of which throughout a match soon became a hallmark of his commentary. With Barry Davies firmly in second place, John Motson was unchallenged in the top spot until he finally retired from live games in 2008; during his career, ‘Motty’ covered 10 World Cup tournaments as well as endless domestic League and Cup matches, finally hanging-up his microphone for good in 2017. By then, he was one of the last such commentators solely associated with a single sport to the point whereby it was hard to imagine a big game without his occasionally hysterical tones attached to it.

Both Dickie Davies and John Motson were products of a very different television era, an era in which TV coverage of sport was restricted in comparison to the multi-channel miasma we find ourselves in today. Whilst many undoubtedly relish the wall-to-wall broadcasts of their chosen game and subscribe in their millions for the privilege of watching it, I personally feel less was more. I could name a tiny handful of present day sports commentators, but I seriously doubt I could do an impression of any of them; the clamour of voices is so overwhelming that none of them stay in the memory long enough. As for those that front the shows…well, let’s just say they’re no Dickie Davies.

© The Editor

Website: https://www.johnnymonroe.co.uk/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?fan_landing=true&u=56665294

Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/797932964

ONE LAST THING…

VWOne strange tradition that never fails to deliver is that of a year entering its final days and the Grim Reaper embarking upon a frenzied period of visiting famous names; for Death, the climax of the twelve-month calendar usually consists of breakneck house-to-house calls as though he’s required to fulfil a specific celebrity quota before 31 December and always leaves it till the last minute. Indeed, he left it so late this year that he ended up calling on two exemplary figures in their chosen fields on the same day, fashion designer Vivienne Westwood and Brazilian football legend Pelé. The latter’s battle with cancer had been publicised and his hospitalisation routinely referenced during the recent World Cup, when Lionel Messi became the latest player to wear the crown that the man born Edson Arantes do Nacimento had copyrighted from the age of 17; in contrast with an anticipated passing that had felt inevitable for several weeks, news that Vivienne Westwood has also died came as more of a surprise, with few beyond her inner circle aware she was fatally ill. Born within six months of each other, one was a king and one was a dame, and both left an indelible mark on 20th century pop culture that will long outlast their mortal remains.

At a time when access to football played beyond Europe was minimal to say the least, the World Cup was the only real window to the global game available to football followers in the UK and on the Continent – and even then it could be something of a logistical challenge for it to reach British and European screens. If the tournament was staged in South America – such as Chile in 1962 – the fact that broadcasting’s satellite age was still a twinkle in Telstar’s eye meant games would be shot on film and then rushed to a waiting plane; in 1962, TV viewers over here had to wait an unimaginable two days after the Final itself was played before they actually got to see the match transmitted on the BBC. Four years earlier, at the least the contest was a little closer to home, staged in Sweden. This was just the sixth World Cup tournament, and up to that point the Jules Rimet trophy had only been held aloft by three countries – Uruguay, Italy and West Germany. Brazil had reached the Final on one solitary occasion – 1950 – and had suffered an inconceivable loss on home soil to Uruguay; they felt it was their destiny to win, but despite their dazzling flair, Brazil never seemed able to leap that final hurdle to immortality. And then, in 1958, they unveiled a prodigy.

In 1958, the 17-year-old Vivienne Swire had relocated from her birthplace in working-class Derbyshire to begin student life on a jewellery course at Harrow Art School; on the other side of the world, Edson Arantes do Nacimento – who had emerged from a poverty-stricken corner of Sao Paulo – was the great discovery of Brazilian club Santos and was a year into his international career when the World Cup in Sweden came calling. Rapidly on his way to becoming a household name in his own country, Pelé (having adopted the time-honoured Brazilian tactic of going by a nickname) was Brazil’s secret weapon in 1958. Although he didn’t make his debut until the third and final group game, by the time the team entered the knock-out stage – which in those more manageable days of just 16 teams was the Quarter-Final – he scored the only goal against Wales; in the Semi-Final Vs France he netted a hat-trick and the rest of the world sat up and took notice. In the Final, he scored twice as Brazil hammered the host nation 5-2 and finally fulfilled their destiny by getting their hands on the most coveted prize in football. Overnight, the teenager had become a global superstar.

Four years later, Pelé’s reputation had grown to the point where Santos had received numerous tempting offers for their greatest asset from a string of eager English and European big guns – including Manchester United and Real Madrid – but had held firm, with the Brazilian Government declaring him an official national treasure in order to prevent his export. He kick-started Brazil’s defence of the World Cup in Chile with the expectations of a nation weighing heavily on his shoulders, but suffered an injury early in the tournament and played no further part in the contest; despite Brazil retaining the trophy without him in Chile, Pelé fared even worse in England in 1966, exposed to the worst ‘professional tackles’ of the era as he was kicked out of the competition by Bulgarian and Portuguese defenders; the holders exited at the group stage and Pelé vowed to never grace the global stage again. Whilst all this was happening, Vivienne Westwood had walked out on her first marriage (from which she took her surname) and had set up home with Malcolm McLaren, a partnership that would prove fruitful for both. Although earning a wage as a primary school teacher, Westwood was already designing her own clothes, and by the early 1970s she and McLaren had opened a boutique called Let It Rock on Chelsea’s King’s Road, one that specialised in vintage Teddy Boy gear from the 50s.

As Westwood and McLaren were establishing themselves on the King’s Road, Pelé had relented from his decision of 1966 and was back in the Brazil line-up for the Mexico World Cup in 1970. Like Maradona in 1986 and Messi in 2022, this was Pelé’s chance to justify his reputation before a global audience, and he – and his team – didn’t disappoint. Even now, over half-a-century later, that Brazil side is still acknowledged as arguably the finest team ever to win the competition; indeed, so overwhelmed were FIFA by Brazil’s performance that they allowed them to keep the Jules Rimet trophy forever as they became the first country to capture it for a third time. Yes, Pelé was the star man, but he was ably supported by players whose names evoked Renaissance artists – Jairzinho, Rivelino, Carlos Alberto – and who played with an artistic flair unparalleled in the history of the game. Prior to the Final, the game of the tournament came between Brazil and defending champions England; Brazil won 1-0, but the match is chiefly remembered for Gordon Banks’ miraculous save against Pelé – as memorable a moment as Pelé’s attempted goal from the halfway line against Czechoslovakia. Brazil defeated Italy 4-1 in the Final, with the opening goal coming from the man himself; it was Pele’s last game in the World Cup, retiring from international football a year later and resisting efforts to coax him out of international retirement in 1974.

By the mid-70s, Vivienne Westwood and Malcolm McLaren had renamed their boutique ‘Sex’ and had begun selling the kind of fetish gear normally unseen outside of Soho backrooms; Westwood was certainly ahead of her time, considering such gear is now commonplace with gimps on dog-leads entertaining toddlers on Pride parades. They then tapped into a craze amongst impoverished London art students (including a certain Johnny Rotten) for wearing ripped clothes held together by safety pins; the two strands combined and created the Punk look, which – when stitched to the music produced by the band McLaren managed, The Sex Pistols – ended up selling a lifestyle. It was the springboard for Westwood to become Britain’s most renowned and radical young designer, and she never really looked back. As Punk was bubbling on the King’s Road, Pelé had done the unthinkable and relocated from Santos to the US, helping to launch the North American Soccer League in the colours of the New York Cosmos. Hip Americans who were finding football a hard sell instantly warmed to the fact a black man was considered the planet’s finest footballer, and even though Pelé was arguably past his best at 35, he still outshone most of the competition on the stateside field of play and didn’t finally retire for good until 1977.

Whether an elder statesman still selling his sport around the world or an established fashion designer attaching her profitable name to whichever cause she sought to promote, both Pelé and Vivienne Westwood had become global brands by the time they simultaneously bowed-out of the spotlight and both are pretty much irreplaceable, however many pretenders to their respective crowns they survived in their lifetimes and will continue to withstand in death.

© The Editor

Website: https://www.johnnymonroe.co.uk/

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?fan_landing=true&u=56665294

Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/769970801